"List of shame"
This is an interesting idea.
The state would start naming companies with the most workers enrolled in taxpayer-funded Medicaid programs if Gov. Blagojevich signs a measure that business leaders say would have no impact other than to generate "a list of shame" that would embarrass them.
Under a little-noticed provision inserted into a bill the General Assembly approved last week, officials would create a list of employers whose workers lack adequate private health insurance and must turn to the state for help paying their doctor bills. [...]
But businesses are dubious, fearing a bad rap if they show up on the list.
Um, isn't that the point?
"There's no law saying you have to give your employees insurance," (IL Chamber spokesman) Carney said. "What if every company in the state decided we're not going to have any more insurance? I'd imagine that'd create a huge burden."
If this sort of thing is a "burden," then you'd wonder why the Chamber is so supportive of it.
"These types of bills are aimed at bringing negative publicity to large companies who bring hundreds of thousands of new jobs to this country," said Nate Hurst, a spokesman for Arkansas-based Wal-Mart
Other stories:
The giant retailer, which has 91,000 full-time and part-time employees in Florida, has about 12,300 workers or dependents eligible for Medicaid.
Wal-Mart, with about 25 percent of the company's 37,000 workers on TennCare, tops the list of businesses with employees on the expanded Medicaid program. Wal-Mart is the state's largest private employer.
A November 2004 New York Times article cites a study in Georgia that found 10,000 children of Wal-Mart employees were in the state's healthcare program at a cost to taxpayers of $10 million a year. The same article describes a hospital in North Carolina that found that 31 percent of its 1,900 patients were Wal-Mart employees on Medicaid, and an additional 16 percent were Wal-Mart employees with no insurance at all.
Retail giant Wal-Mart tops the list of companies in Alabama whose employees have children on Medicaid, the Advertiser reported, citing state records. Wal-Mart workers' children account for 3,864 children on the Medicaid rolls at a cost between $5.8 million and $8.2 million.
Wal-Mart's survey showed that 5% of its hourly workers receive coverage through Medicaid, the federal-state program for the poor.
Among employees who have been with the company more than two years, that number dropped to 3%. And the survey showed that 7% of Wal-Mart employees were on Medicaid three months before joining Wal-Mart. In contrast, 7% of the hourly workers at other retailers in the study were on Medicaid, up from 6% before their employment.
"Wal-Mart does not encourage our associates to apply for public assistance," says company spokeswoman Sarah Clark. "We work hard to keep our associate premiums affordable and think we are doing a good job."
17 Comments...
WARNING: Personally insulting and otherwise inappropriate comments (including all profanity) will be immediately deleted! Threads will be closed after 3 deletions. Try to behave like reasonable adults.Click here to notify the "Comment Posse" about objectionable posts.
Companies having employees on taxpayer funded prgrams is a travesty.
The state government *should* lecture them about responsibility.
After all, the state does not have any of its employees on taxpayer funded programs, and is VERY tight and responsible with its accounting and benefit management.
And people wonder why I don't vote..
Hey, too bad GB Rod doesn't make those companies bounce their workrolls agaisnt Fed SS lists for being legal workers.
Then forward the companies with illegals working there to HSD
Sounds like WalMart's high priced lobbyists blew this one. Three cheers to Drea!!
WalMart should adopt an 'Illinois style' benefit system. Everyone will be required by law to be taken care of.
It will only cost $100k a year to employ a stockboy (salary + benefits + pension)
Of course, only the very rich will be able to shop at Walmart, because microwaves will cost $400 (remember those days?), but all will be taken care of.
What incentive would an employer have to provide health benefits if the state is willing to do so?
I asked that question on the House floor. Now, I guess we know the answer.
Carney said. "What if every company in the state decided we're not going to have any more insurance?
My guess - the price of insurance would fall dramatically.
All it does is make their reality public.
So let's pass a similar law to disclose who hires illegals!
Why are we surprised that companies are taking advantage of the fact that the government is basic willing to insure almost everybody?
If you want companies to stop taking advantages of government programs, cut the damn programs. It's not the companies fault. The blame lies on this nanny-state notion that the state is morally responsible for covering such a huge percentage of the population.
I think the point is that Wal-Mart doesn't want the info to get out because it is ashamed of its own corporate behavior - but not ashamed enough to do something about it, apparently.
Is the state going to start supplying pensions for everyone now whose company doesn't offer one? Maybe they could publish a list with then names of all the companies short changing theie pension funds. Of course the the state of Illinois would have to be first on the list.
There was a time in this country where employees of large companies did have insurance and pensions and the business still made a decent profit. What is so wrong with people have insurance and a pension?
CEO's could maybe only afford 1 vacation home back then. I can understand the need to shift the profits from the employee to the CEO. No CEO should have to live off of less than $10 million a year. The rich get richer and the middle class is dying.
There's disugust at public employee pensions, but we ignore CEO salaries and huge profits at the employees expense. Walmerica
This is a great move. The largest company in the nation and the largest retailer in the world can certainly afford to buy health insurance for all employees. And their families. And keep prices where they are. Just look at their profit margin! They can afford it. A better move, probably, would be to just buy basic health insurance through Medicaid for every resident in the state, and take that expense off the backs of business altogether. It would almost certainly be much cheaper that way too. Congrats to Mary Flowers!
Dan, a better idea would be to let their employees join a union and have them pay into their pension and healthcare plans.
Yes -- this thing was DOA as a standalone bill. Got 41 votes, I believe.
GOPers did speak out against this on the floor, but the Speaker found the perfect bill to sneak it into -- an agreed bill that generates a whole boatload of new federal cash into Illinois and is already accounted for in the budget.
He got them there...
The way it's going there won't be affordable health insurance for anyone. I see tons of comments about how selfish state employees should be grateful for their benefits but here is the alternative people.
For all the talk of Wal-Mart, they're hardly the only ones that should be worried right now.
What about pretty much the entire hospitality industry? I'm sure they'll figure prominently on a list.
That's true, 11:37 am, but what can the state do to get a fair union election in a Wal-Mart? I thought most of that was pre-empted. I guess the state could tie any local or state economic development dollars to an agreement to permit a card check election. Most of these super-centers do get government money, as I understand it. And 8:39 pm, since low-skill manufacturing is moving / has moved overseas, and those jobs used to provide benefits, we should move to make all retail (where jobs can not be exported) provide benefits. Or have the state provide basic benefits to everyone. We pay for it with slightly higher prices (or slightly lower profits) the first way, or through slightly higher taxes the second way. Currently, we pay for it with higher taxes to fund Medicaid for those who work for cheap employers.
Post a Comment
<< Home