Friday, May 20, 2005

Tristano backgrounder

This is a newspaper column I wrote in June of 2002. It will give you some background on the Tristano indictment. The column is based on a much longer Capitol Fax, which you can find here.


Crain's Chicago Business has reported that during the summer of 2000, just about everyone at House Republican Leader Lee Daniels' Chicago office was allegedly paid with state money to work on political campaigns. The magazine also documented that several staffers were apparently reimbursed by taxpayers for campaign travel expenses.

This would be illegal, of course. So, I picked up the phone and started calling people who once worked for Daniels. I convinced six to talk.

Their stories were almost identical, and the picture they all painted was ugly. If they are to be believed, and I believe them, then somebody needs to go to jail.

Every one of my sources fears retaliation, even though they no longer work for Daniels. "They put the fear of God in you if you said anything," said one former House GOP staffer. Another likened the job to working for the Mafia.

And most said they were told staff would be blamed if things ever got rough. Sure enough, a few days ago Daniels said he didn't know anything about the allegations and would cooperate with an investigation of staff wrongdoing.

* The Chicago Office - A November, 2001, memo from one of Daniels' top political people pretty much sums up the problems at Daniels' Chicago office - a completely state funded operation.

The memo was sent to then-state Republican Party Chairman Rich Williamson and referred to efforts to fill a vacant GOP state central committee slot. Williamson is advised to call the staffer at Daniels' state office in Chicago.

"The point of the (Chicago) office was to run political campaigns," said one source. "They'd have political meetings there. They used the state computers to print out (precinct) walk sheets."

Another former staffer said election programs were installed on the office's computers.

"They said, 'Here's the campaign you're gonna be working on,' and they send you out and they pay you the way they want to." said one source.

Another source claimed he was "under orders to run a campaign on state time."

* Comp Time - A couple of months ago, I told you that the House Republican state payroll actually increased during the last two months of the 2000 election, while all the other legislative staff payrolls shrank. Part of their excuse was that the staffers were reimbursed for "comp time" - days off in lieu of overtime pay - while they worked campaigns.

Yet all but one of the former staffers (and he left years ago) said comp time at the Chicago office is a fraud.

"I was on staff just two weeks and they gave me ten days' comp time," claimed one former staffer, who said he worked no overtime in those two weeks.

Every source who worked in the Chicago office said, as far as they could tell, overtime was never even tracked. The chief of staff would send them a memo telling them how much comp time they had.

"Comp time would just appear and you'd use it," said another source.

"They'd say, 'We need you to do campaign work for seven days, so we'll give you the comp days to pay for it," explained one.

"There's no overtime at that (Chicago) office," said a different source.

* Vouchers - "I was in a situation where (the campaign) screwed me out of money, so they told me to file vouchers," claims one former staff member.

The staffer had run up several bills that the Daniels campaign fund refused to pay. But the low-paid worker needed the cash, so he was advised to "just say you were gone a little bit longer," on some travel and let the state pick up the tab through travel reimbursements.

"Because they paid you so (poorly), you needed that travel money," said another source, who said they were regularly paid with state money for campaign travel.

"I was asked repeatedly to voucher," for campaign expenses, claimed another source, who said he "put up a fight about it" on a "regular basis."

"Their counter was, 'Calm down, don't worry about it, this is the way things are done, but there's no way you're going to get paid (from the campaign account),'" the source said.

Another former staff member said he also didn't voucher and was under no pressure, but claimed his superiors "would sign anything."

Every former staffer I talked to understood that what they did was against the law. I asked one if that bothered him. "It was my job," he said. "I wanted to run campaigns. I just thought that's the way it was. It's the state of Illinois. It's Chicago."

-30-




By the way, mucho props to attorney Rich Means for doing almost all the investigative work on which Crain's based its reporting. Means is getting married this month so the Tristano indictment is an early wedding present.

15 Comments...

WARNING: Personally insulting and otherwise inappropriate comments (including all profanity) will be immediately deleted! Threads will be closed after 3 deletions. Try to behave like reasonable adults.

Click here to notify the "Comment Posse" about objectionable posts.

At 5/20/2005 12:34:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Now that's the business as usual I'm talkin about.

 

At 5/20/2005 02:18:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Now why are we surprised? OK, many thought MJM (I feel like I am writing JMJ and a nun is watching!) would be the guy caught but no, it is the R's...at least for now.

G'nite...

 

At 5/20/2005 07:15:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Which races were they working on, and will those that were "helped" also be punished? I'm pretty sure my Metro-East State Rep's office was campaign central for a couple of campaign cycles.

 

At 5/20/2005 07:51:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mongo,

The big difference between MJM and Lee Daniels is that MJM always erred on the side of using campaign funds to pay for political activities.

Lee Daniels was too cheap (or something) to use campaign funds, so he leveraged state funds to pay for political activity at every opportunity.

Sure, state staffers from both caucuses ended up working on campaigns. The difference is that one caucus ended up using state funds for campaigns, the other caucus was ultra-careful to avoid using state funds.

 

At 5/20/2005 07:56:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Rich Means was Christina Tobin's and my lawyer when we sued the Speaker for employee time sheets for last June.

As I pointed out on another post, the Speaker's lawyers won and no one can use the Freedom of Information Act to obtain time sheets for legislative employees.

 

At 5/20/2005 08:33:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Other Anonymous,

I would not expect MJM to do something this stupid. He is too smart (and by that I am not implying he does bad things). I remember thinking when Skinner et al sought timesheets that MJM should hand them over...there will be nothing on them.

Hmmmm...graft, corruption, using state payrollers for legislative campaigns...yep, sounds Republican.

 

At 5/20/2005 09:22:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Even Fawell didn't do all of this (as alleged). Tristano is looking at a long sentence, if all of this can be proven.

 

At 5/20/2005 09:33:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 

At 5/20/2005 09:39:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

everyone knows that mjm was notoriously squeaky clean ... always taking staff off payroll (so much to the extent that many long-term dem staffers have lost time toward retirement b/c of campaign work). all true about daniels ... he used everyone on staff from policy staff to (leadership) secretaries, who were issued comp time to be used only for campaign work (ie, remember the Hannig building next to IL gop hq on 4th street?). usually beginning sometime after the fair. i just don't understand why it took THIS long for everything to come out when everyone knew what was going on for years.

 

At 5/20/2005 09:53:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The only surprise in that column is that Rich Means is getting married, and that's the best news in it! Congrats to the Rhino!

 

At 5/20/2005 10:05:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

i'll also add that daniels' staff WAS made to feel that if anything was said or done to offend House GOP - that you'd be history. and there were always cryptic references to his connections to (george) ryan (if you remember, george made LAD his "heir apparent" to take over as minority leader when he left ... why, is anyone's guess!) - so, you'd kiss future state employment good-bye.

 

At 5/21/2005 02:47:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

anyone that says that the mjm operation was squeaky clean is delusional. To me this is the biggest wonder of all. His lawyers are miracle-workers.

 

At 5/21/2005 10:23:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Have to agree with the 2:47 Anon poster. While House Dem staffers were taken off payroll during campaigns, the feds obviously didn't take much of a look at what went on during session. Tristano and Co. got greedy and, frankly, stupid. Still, MJM is very very lucky they did not look more into the "use of state resources" for political purposes angle. It didn't compare to what apparently Daniels was doing, but it was there.

 

At 5/23/2005 12:23:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

you don't see to many mjm staffers coming out to disparage the operation ... the same cannot be said of (former) daniels' staff.

 

At 5/23/2005 10:07:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's a pretty simple way to compare.
Just remember, it's easy to disparage an operation that is defunct.
not so easy to rip on the head of all illinois dems. It's called fear.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home